On Fri, 4 Feb 2000, G.W. Haywood wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> More topical:
>
> Well I think we've done that one. It seems that if not actually an
> error the documents conspire to confuse. Certainly one for the errata
> even if it's not really wrong. I have a couple of dozen other notes
> about the Eagle Book, is there a CVS snapshot of the errata somewhere?
> Or something like that? I'd be glad to contribute/modify/whatever.
Ged, please send the reports directly to Doug or submit them thru the
errata page at oreilly.com. See my previous replies with this very subject
for the exact URL.
> PS: Stas, erratum = one of them. Er, it.
> errata = more than one of them:)
Mea culpa :)
_______________________________________________________________________
Stas Bekman mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.stason.org/stas
Perl,CGI,Apache,Linux,Web,Java,PC http://www.stason.org/stas/TULARC
perl.apache.org modperl.sourcegarden.org perlmonth.com perl.org
single o-> + single o-+ = singlesheaven http://www.singlesheaven.com
