Hi there, This isn't a silly question. At least I hope it isn't. On Wed, 6 Dec 2000, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote: [snip,snip] > A modifies a row in X and adds a row to Y. A commits X, which succeeds. > A commits Y, which fails. > > The only thing that Machine A can do now is send an email to the DBA > > "..." says the DBA, Given that it's designed to fail sooner or later, are there good reasons why someone would put together a system in that way? 73, Ged. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... brian moseley
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Dave Rolsky
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Ask Bjoern Hansen
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Leon Brocard
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Robin Berjon
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Matt Sergeant
- J2EE and distributed commits ... Tim Sweetman
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Jeffrey W. Baker
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... barries
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Ged Haywood
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project... Matthew Kennedy
- [OT] 1%, two-phase commits, e... Eric Strovink
- Re: mod_perl advocacy project resurre... Gunther Birznieks
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurre... darren chamberlain
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project res... Jens-Uwe Mager
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrectio... barries
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Ajit Deshpande
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection Gunther Birznieks
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection J. J. Horner
- Re: RFC: mod_perl advocacy project resurrection brian moseley