I know this sounds kind of simple minded but why not bench test the site,
set everything up in the office get a good switch plug the site into 1 port
and 5-10 client boxes with some load testing software and plug it in to the
same switch and beat the crap out of it.  After you do this for a while and
find all the hot spots show it to the customer and go here it works.

marc

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt Sergeant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Jeff Yoak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 15, 2001 3:24 AM
Subject: Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modules


> On Fri, 14 Dec 2001, Jeff Yoak wrote:
>
> > All,
> >
> >          I wasn't sure what volume of response to expect when I
originally
> > wrote.  Thank you all for the comments that you all are making.  They
are
> > helping.  Given that the response is fairly high, I'm waiting for stuff
to
> > roll in rather than replying to each of you.  Don't think it is falling
on
> > unappreciating ears.  :-)
> >          To respond to a few recurring comments / questions:
> >
> > Me?  I've spent most of the last four years working on mod_perl-based
stuff
> > and most of the last eight working with Perl.  Actually I've worked with
> > folks who were involved with some of the projects you've mentioned,
having
> > been at idealab!, a parent of eToys and CitySearch.  One of the original
> > (THE original?) developer at CitySearch was probably the most helpful
> > mentor / teacher I've ever worked with.  I programmed in C a lot early
in
> > my career, but at this point I couldn't write anything substantial
without
> > brushing up, and frankly wouldn't care to.  It just isn't as fun to work
> > with C.  But then, the argument, "But if you used C, you wouldn't get to
> > work with ME!" may not convince some of these people with their values
all
> > screwed up...  ;-)
>
> Actually that would be my argument. When you're getting investors in, the
> primary thing they should be looking to buy into is the quality of the
> people there, not necessarily the code, because only one out of those two
> can be fixed easily (even in our current times, totally replacing a
> programming team is a difficult thing to do).
>
> I write C. I write Perl. And I combine them both to good effect. But, I
> wouldn't even consider writing anything but time critical routines in C -
> I do as much as possible in Perl for the following reasons:
>
>  - It's fast enough.
>  - It's safer.
>  - It has a built in test harness (Test::Harness).
>  - It's more fun.
>  - It's faster to develop in.
>  - It's OO, and that saves me time and effort.
>  - It has an infinitely better community than C.
>
> The last point is probably my favourite, though probably means bugger all
> to an investor.
>
> --
> <!-- Matt -->
> <:->Get a smart net</:->
>

Reply via email to