... > work on Mars. The investor claims to have evaluated Perl vs. C years ago, > to have witnessed that every single hit on the webserver under mod_perl > causes a CPU usage spike that isn't seen with C, and that under heavy load ]- this seems to me like non-compiled script, module or eventually running under Apache::PerlRun :"))
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apac... Jeff Yoak
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance ... Matt Sergeant
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high perform... Marc Spitzer
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache m... Perrin Harkins
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apac... Jimi Thompson
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache m... lembark
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apac... C. Jon Larsen
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance ... Stas Bekman
- Success story. Steven Lembark
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache m... Tim Gardner
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache m... raptor
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modules John Armstrong
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modules Dave Hodgkinson
- RE: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modules Thomas Moore
- RE: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modul... Rob Nagler
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modul... Perrin Harkins
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache m... Dave Hodgkinson
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apac... Toni Andjelkovic
- Re: mod_perl vs. C for high performance ... Dave Hodgkinson
- RE: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modul... Dave Rolsky
- RE: mod_perl vs. C for high performance Apache modul... brian moseley