On Mon, 21 Jul 2003, Sam Tregar wrote: > On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > > OTOH, if you were to try to replicate some of Mason's more powerful > > features with H::T, like autohandlers, inheritance, etc., then I'm > > sure that'd bring H::T's speed down to Mason's level ;) > > I wouldn't be too sure. I implemented a lot of that stuff to add > HTML::Template support to Bricolage and it's still much faster than > Mason.
"A lot" as in _all_ of it, or a "lot" as in autohandlers and dhandlers? I'll believe it when I see it. There's nothing about Mason that's particularly slow except the code that implements the features. In other words, I don't think one could do all of the same stuff, or even most, and achieve a huge speed increase. There would have to be something sacrificed. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
