* at 29/10 09:31 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > There are 2 or 3 things that need to be in the name, "Validator", that's > what it is, "HTML" because that's what works on and possibly "W3C" because > that's where the engine comes from, so I'd suggest > > HTML::Validator::W3C
Which is going to get confused with HTML::Validator and also I think you need to make sure people know it's a web thing. > Just from a searching point of view, this is a much easier module name to > find. > > I think Detailed is unnecessary since there isn't already a module out > there that gives an undetailed set of results, Ah, but there will be. See the intial mail for details. Thanks S
