Struan Donald writes:

> So, does WWW::Validator::W3CMarkup::Detailed seem like a good name for
> this?

I don't think [EMAIL PROTECTED] would like it being under WWW -- that
namespace has got far too messy with unrelated things in it.  WebService
is the prefered top-level namespace for modules which provide a Perl
interface to a service that is available over a website.

I'd also suggest that having 'HTML' in there instead of 'Markup' is
better, as it indicates exactly what sort of mark-up is being validated.

So how about:

  WebService::Validator::HTML::W3C

which allows for other modules in the future as:

  WebService::Validator::HTML::Foo # for appropriate values of 'Foo'
  WebService::Validator::CSS::W3C

And if anybody writes an HTML validator that runs locally and doesn't
require web access, then of course it doesn't go under WebService.

Smylers

Reply via email to