Re: module to access w3c validator

[Jim Cromie]

Struan Donald wrote:

So, does WWW::Validator::W3CMarkup::Detailed seem like a good name for
this?
 

as you noted earlier, Detailed insnt quite right..

How about:
  Analysis, Critique, ErrorSet,
   Details (this suffix is more noun, less adjective)
   or Feedback  ( just a punt, probably worse than detailed )
Thanks

Struan

.

 


WRT Fergals later point:

you wouldn't be doing your clients any
favours by making their production servers depend on a webservice that has
no specified interface and no promises about availability.
This is a good arg for doing it both ways (ie at least consider them,
and dont preclude them by mis-designing), making the SW-install
request (thereby covering your bases - so when W3C shuts them off
for pounding their server - You Told Them So).
OT - Chris, does your email address get you black-holed a lot ?
with the amount of porn-spam these days, and not-quite-there 
filter-tools (mozilla anyway)
Ive had to de-junk legit email periodically.