If the code is not to be used by others, may be you shouldn't upload it to
CPAN at all?!
If it's a piece of code used by a re-usable module of yours, then it should
be put under
that module's namespace, instead of putting it under a non-related
namespace.
--
sherzod
: -----Original Message-----
: From: Fergal Daly [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2003 17:20
: To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
: Subject: Author's namespace
:
:
: Is there, or should there be a namespace for each author?
: Somewhere I can put
: modules that I don't consider worth releasing but that I
: do use in some of my
: released modules? For instance I have a very simple
: method maker that I
: wouldn't expect anyone else to use and I don't want to
: bother writing docs
: for it. So instead of including a copy with each module,
: I'd like to upload
: it as something like
:
: Authors::FDALY::MM
:
: and then I can use it in my modules but I'm not really
: publishing it for
: others to use... yes, I know it gets used in the things I
: do publish so in
: that sense it is published but lots of modules have
: undocumented bits that
: are not really intended for reuse by anyone else so it's
: no worse than that
: and it's better than having Test::Deep::MM an identical
: file called
: Blah::Blah::MM for the next module I release.
:
: Exactly how stupid is this idea?
:
: F
:
:
