[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dave Rolsky) writes:
> On Tue, 10 Feb 2004, A. Pagaltzis wrote:
>
> > * It's better to have comparative articles than module centric
> > reviews; they're also less susceptible to manipulation.
>
> I think these are great. The problem is they're a lot of work. I've
> written two (POOP and date/time) and I know Perrin wrote one for
> templating systems.
Hrm, there isn't an easy way to say this, but an issue with module
reviews is that they're generally written by someone with a particular
bias towards their own solution. (I say that as someone who wrote one
too ;)
That's not necessarily a problem if they're presented as a "I took a
look at the options and this is why I'm doing it my way", but is not
all it could be if it is presented as an unbiased review.
--
Life would be so much easier if we could just look at the source code.
-- Dave Olson
