----- Original Message -----
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 3:57 PM
Subject: Re: MD Atomic awareness
Hi ROG all, again.
As is often the case new thoughts emerge after posting.
I realise my argument is unfocused and would like to say why a little
clearer.
I find the argument on awareness somehow valid, and at the same time the
notion of altering the MOQ has been bothering me. Perhaps because I see it
as the man made abstract piece of art as previously mentioned.
It struck me that as I make abstract art which is a result of the Quality
event, the question has to be, why do I create more given that the idea of
Quality obviously comes across, and in most cases without any verbal
communication? Obviously there is a monetary influence, but I do not create
only abstract art, and abstracts have always seemed far more important work.
Again, the MOQ is a result of the Quality event and not itself Quality. For
some the RMP MOQ is enough to get the idea across, for others a different
sculpture might be required. As long as the first still exists then trying
to create another seems acceptable. As long as we realise each is an
imperfect manmade communication of Quality in which we can see more or less
value. For the only way to see it is to be open to it in the first place.
Again, something you may have thrashed out before? Is this consistent with
other validations of what the moq is trying to achieve?
JEZ
> MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
> Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
> MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
> http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
>
>
MOQ.ORG - http://www.moq.org
Mail Archive - http://alt.venus.co.uk/hypermail/moq_discuss/
MD Queries - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe from moq_discuss follow the instructions at:
http://www.moq.org/md/subscribe.html
