RTI---just like NCLB--- is a good idea gone very, very wrong. What has to  
happen is data collection. We need to collect evidence and document the  damage 
done and share it with whoever will listen. Data can be a  double edged sword. 
Let's use it for the good of children. It doesn't have to be  numerical 
data...it just needs to be clear and convincing evidence presented to  the 
press, 
administrators, politicians, anyone who will listen.
 
I read two books on RTI this summer because our district is starting to  move 
this direction. One very positive part of RTI...as it is originally  
intended...is that we can identify kids for extra help without using the  
discrepancy 
model. It always drives me nuts that I have to wait until a child is  two 
years behind before he or she qualified for extra help. By then, it  is almost 
too 
late and it becomes incredibly HARD to help the  child. What saves us in my 
district is that we get NO Reading First  money and no mandate to implement RTI 
as many of you have described here. We  have the chance here to try to 
improve classroom instruction and find extra time  and new ways to use 
personnel to 
target children who need the most help. 
 
My students need extra time and work in comprehension, so we will be using  
Soar to Success as an intervention. From what I can tell, this program  does 
NOT seem to be contradictory to best practices as we have discussed  here on 
the 
listserv. I do not have to use a script...I can use what I know  about these 
kids to plan lessons for THEIR needs. And I can tweak lessons...so  far the 
'fidelity police' have not made it to this corner of Maryland.
 
SO...having said that...thanks to those who have sent synthesis  
ideas...Anyone have any great synthesis lessons for primary aged kids---grade 2 
 and 3? 
Good book ideas? I can't be the only one who has struggled with  this!
Jennifer
 
 
 
  In a message dated 9/2/2008 11:54:18 A.M. Eastern Daylight  Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

>From  Beverly:

..............if we just ignore the RtI-ers, we are able to  teach in the
way we see is best for our kids.  :-(  



Beverly and others:

I am an administrator and I am  having a very hard time "ignoring" RtI -
it is a law in my state - in fact  our law has gone above and beyond the
federal guidelines.  I do not  have a classroom where I can just shut my
door and teach the way I believe  - which is also supported by tons and
tons of research.  So, what do I  do?  Our state is requiring that an
enormous amount of resources be  put toward this "law" without the first
idea of what it means and how it is  ruining our kids' education!  I am
extremely concerned and I have been  saying so for over a year with
little to no response from anyone.  I  feel like people are just
following the herd - like they've just given up  and feel they are doomed
to state oversight and WORST practice in education  as opposed to best
practice.  I would hope that those who subscribe to  this listserv are
the professionals that could actually do something about  this.  It won't
happen if we just moan and groan - teachers pointing  fingers at
administration and administrators pointing fingers at the  state.  What
are people out there really doing about this?!?!?!?!  



Carrie

K-8, IL


 



**************It's only a deal if it's where you want to go. Find your travel 
deal here.      
(http://information.travel.aol.com/deals?ncid=aoltrv00050000000047)
_______________________________________________
Mosaic mailing list
Mosaic@literacyworkshop.org
To unsubscribe or modify your membership please go to
http://literacyworkshop.org/mailman/options/mosaic_literacyworkshop.org.

Search the MOSAIC archives at http://snipurl.com/MosaicArchive. 

Reply via email to