Re: [MP3 ENCODER] highq mode

[Felix von Leitner]

Thus spake Jeremy Hall ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> I disagree.  From a functional standpoint, changing an option to cause it
> to do the exact opposite of what it once did is confusing at best, and
> disrupts expected behavior.  People upgrading from one release to another
> will find that their "great" sound mp3s will now be horrid, and their
> horrid ones will sound great.  A drop-in replacement for lame will do
> different things.

> I have no problems with adding new options, but changing existing options
> is a bit rough.

For what it's worth, gogo uses higher numbers for better quality in VBR.
That is IMHO another reason to do it that way.

Felix
--
MP3 ENCODER mailing list ( http://geek.rcc.se/mp3encoder/ )