Now you're starting to make me nervous that there is a repository problem!! I spent many hours merging Moller's gmp_h.in into ours. I also replaced the GMP gcd routine with Moller's so his routines should be getting called.
Anyway, get SVN back up and I'll be happy to dig in and see what's going on. Without SVN, though, I'm reluctant to make any changes. --jason Jason Worth Martin Asst. Professor of Mathematics http://www.math.jmu.edu/~martin > > I have just confirmed Bill's timings and it is clear that we are not > gaining full advantage from the new GCD code in eMPIRe. > > I have checked out the changes that Jason made to add this code and I > have found one thing that he didn't do - our gmp_h.in does not include > the definitions of the interfaces to the new GCD routines that are in > Niels Möller's modified gmp_h.in. > > Also, looking at Niels Möller's speed test code, I am inclined to > think that the new code either has to be called directly to get the > speed gain OR the existing GMP routines have to be modified to call > these new routines. I don't think that simply adding the new routines > alone is sufficient alone unless they are called directly (however I > am not sure about this as I have only just started to look at it).. > > best regards, > > Brian --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mpir-devel" group. To post to this group, send email to mpir-devel@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mpir-devel?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
