On Dec 1, 2007 11:57 PM, Brian Schweitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Personally, I would prefer not to codify any of this. I would prefer to > instead spend some time discussing quite which release level ARs do or don't > inherit, as well as working to fill in the holes in our current AR system > (missing "libretto" AR for track-artist, missing "is the same track as" > track-track AR, etc). I'd also prefer to spend some time discussing quite > what we define as being "the same track".
That's what I would prefer as well. I'm strictly against removing existing AR from a later release just because they are redundant, as the ARs on the earliest release are not yet easily available to the later releases. And I like to have the ARs in my file tags and the only option currently is to add redundant ARs. As soon as we get track masters this problem will be solved and the ARs of different tracks can be easily merged. If somebody decides not to add ARs because they are already present in the eraliest release that's ok for me. But I would neither disallow nor remove ARs from later releases. -- Philipp Wolfer _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
