On Dec 3, 2007 4:19 PM, Olivier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So that third way means I'm left with a half-done job, half-backed > releases, no data consistency - which will probably disastisfy > everybody (specially me :-)).
Why no data consistency? I don't understand how identical ARs on two identical tracks can be inconsistent. I understand that plan A is really impractical. We should instead aim for getting the ARs for the original releases correct. It's surely Ok to just remove wrong ARs from later releases. But I still don't see the reason for removing correct ARs. If I spent some time adding all ARs to a later release I surely don't want them removed. My suggestions are: * Normally we can just ese plan B when adding ARs * Don't touch existing (correct) ARs * Don't dissallow adding ARs to later releases as that's currently the only way to make them available to those releases Regards, Philipp _______________________________________________ Musicbrainz-style mailing list Musicbrainz-style@lists.musicbrainz.org http://lists.musicbrainz.org/mailman/listinfo/musicbrainz-style
