Brant, I actually share your opinion on this one, but this isn't something one person should decide.
I think the decision has already been made on this, but I would've preferred not to do this in a rush ... Gert ----- Original Message ----- From: "brant" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 7:01 PM Subject: [nant-dev] NAntContrib > I am a bit confused. Is NAntContrib going away? From my understanding it > was meant to be a standard place where people could share any tasks that > they had written, regardless of weather they were deemed "usefull" by the > NAnt team. > > If the NAnt team thought a task was usefull enough to a large audience then > they could cherry pick from the NAntContrib and include it in a future > release. > > I don't see the need to include ALL tasks into NAnt (but I do think that > most of the tasks submitted are generally usefull), and that tasks not > included should stay in NAntContrib. > > brant > ... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 6:33 AM > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Namespaces and NAnt.Cnntrib tasks > > > > Looks pretty much ok, some minor comments/questions inline ... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Ian MacLean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "Gert Driesen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 2:56 PM > > Subject: [nant-dev] Namespaces and NAnt.Cnntrib tasks > > > > > > > Gert Driesen wrote: > > > > > > > > > > >Will you first make a proposal for incorporating the NAntContrib tasks > > into > > > >NAnt regarding source location, namespace and perhaps class name (don't > > know > > > >if we'll be needing to change class names as well, though). > > > > > > > > > > > below is my basic proposal for where I see the nantcontrib tasks fitting > > > into nant. Source location and namespace are effectively the same thing > > > in our source structure. I'm not too bothered whether everything is > > > moved before the next release because users will be able to use them all > > > regardless. Some of these tasks need some work with regard to > > > formatting, code style etc and I would prefer to have that done before > > > they are moved. comments suggestions ? > > > > > > NAnt.DotNet > > > AssemblyInfoTask.cs > > > DiscoTask.cs > > > GacTask.cs > > > NGenTask.cs > > > WsdlTask.cs > > > XsdTask.cs > > > VersionTask.cs > > > TypedCollectionTask.cs > > > > > > NAnt.Win32 > > > ADSIBaseTask.cs > > > ADSIGetPropertyTask.cs > > > ADSISetPropertyTask.cs > > > > Are these actually win32 specific tasks ? Their name does suggest that, > but > > these are using System.DirectoryServices right ? > > > > We can leave them in Win32 for now, and decide later ... > > > > > > > > TlbExpTask.cs > > > TlbImpTask.cs > > > AxImpTask.cs > > > COMRegisterTask.cs > > > RegasmTask.cs > > > Vb6Task.cs > > > > > > NAnt.VisualCpp > > > RcTask.cs > > > MidlTask.cs > > > McTask.cs > > > > > > NAnt.NUnit.NUnit2 > > > NUnitReportTask.cs > > > > Hasn't this task been supersedes by http://nunit2report.sourceforge.net ? > > > > > > > > NAnt.SourceControl.SourceSafe > > > AddTask.cs > > > BaseTask.cs > > > CheckinTask.cs > > > CheckoutTask.cs > > > GetTask.cs > > > LabelTask.cs > > > UndoCheckoutTask.cs > > > > Will this be NAnt.SourceControl.SourceSafe.Tasks or > > NAnt.SourceControl.Tasks.SourceSafe ? > > > > > > > > General/NAnt.Core ?? > > > ScpTask.cs > > > ValidateXmlTask.cs > > > CodeStatsTask.cs > > > ConcatTask.cs > > > > > > > not too sure about the usefulness of the CodeStatsTask here. Shouldn't it > > be in NAnt.DotNet anyway ? > > > > > unknown - stay in NAnt.Optional ? > > > ChecksumTask.cs > > > HxCompTask.cs > > > HxRegTask.cs > > > IISTasks.cs > > > MailExTask.cs > > > MgmtClassGenTask.cs > > > MSITask.cs > > > MSMTask.cs > > > RecordTask.cs > > > SchemaValidatedTask.cs > > > SlingshotTask.cs > > > SqlTask.cs > > > > > > NAnt.Optional.StarTeam > > > ... > > > > > > >eg. right now, the vss tasks are in a separate namespace in > NAntContrib, > > but > > > >we have no(t yet a) separate namespace for the cvs tasks. we should > try > > to > > > >make it all consistent, I think > > > > > > > > > > > of course. Can you think of a name for the directory containing the cvs > > > tasks that isn't 'CVS' ? > > > > I'm afraid not ... > > > > Gert > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 > > _______________________________________________ > > nant-developers mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including > Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. > Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. > http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 > _______________________________________________ > nant-developers mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
