Hi Ana,

Well, as James Wallbank said on here a little while back "emails are a 
killer app"...something like that.

Much of the younger generation's experience with networked technology 
and its culture, now seems to mainly involve mobile phones, tweeting & 
Facbook etc, and are not really using email lists that much, outside of 
educational contexts it seems. Which is why many are proposing for their 
own generation the rather fait accompli (& personally self-defeating) 
term of 'post-internet' - which of course, serves the corporations well 
an plays into their hands, these corporations would rather we all used 
their frameworks rather than self-made communities.

When I interviewed Dmytri Kleiner, about The Telekommunist Manifesto, a 
few months ago (http://su.pr/17poHc) I found his ideas around corporate 
networks very interesting "I avoided using Facebook and similar for 
quite some time, sticking to email, usenet, and irc as I have since the 
90s. When I co-authored InfoEnclosure 2.0, I was still not a user of 
these platforms. However it became more and more evident that not only 
where people adopting these platforms, but that they were developing a 
preference for receiving information on them, they would rather be 
contacted there than by way of email, for instance. Posting stuff of 
Facebook engaged them, while receiving email for many people has become 
a bother. The reasons for this are themselves interesting, and begin 
with the fact that millions where being spent by Capitalists to improve 
the usability of these platforms, while the classic Internet platforms 
were more or less left as they were in the 90s. Also, many people are 
using social media that never had been participants in the sorts of 
mailing lists, usenet groups, etc that I was accustomed to using to 
share information."

Regarding The Empyre list - it is a shame that they have so many broken 
links - I have enjoyed reading the discussions & taking part in the 
discussions on there, in the past years and quite recently. I think the 
list itself still has a few years left to carry on exploring the 
interesting culture we all share here, and elsewhere...

wishing you well.

marc

licker
 > I remember I was subscribed to Syndicate as well but I never heard 
about NN and never participated, I felt Syndicate was more a list for 
announcements of events, maybe I only subscribed to the events list.
 > But it's interesting to discuss the validity of the mailinglists 
today, as forums for discussion or for sharing information.
 > I have been participating in the Australian list -empyre for many 
years and now I feel the list is slowly dissapearing. Some of you 
(Patrick Lichty was a briljant moderator for some month's ago) are 
members of -empyre too. Do you feel the same as me? It's not strange, 
the list has been on the net for ages and the moderators do a terrific 
job but the most of people are freelancing artists or teachers with very 
little time to spare...
 > I tried today to reach their arrchives and the links were broken.
 > It would be a real loss if -empyre is gone.
 > Ana
 >
 > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:54 PM, marc garrett 
<marc.garr...@furtherfield.org> wrote:
 >
 >     Hi Ana,
 >
 >     Thanks for the link to 'Doctress Neutopia', very interesting...
 >
 >     Yes - I remember on the (once brilliant) Syndicate list years 
ago, where
 >     Netochka Nezvanova, N.N., antiorp, integer dominated, causing all 
kinds
 >     of upset...
 >
 >     "The net entity nn (Netochka Nezvanova, integer, antiorp, etc.), a
 >     pseudonym used by an international group of artists and 
programmers in
 >     their extensive and aggressive mailing list-based 
online-performances and
 >     for other art projects, had been subscribed to the Syndicate list 
in 1997.
 >     It was, as the first of less than a handful of people ever, 
unsubscribed
 >     against its will because it was spamming the list so heavily that all
 >     meaningful communication was blocked. In January 2001, nn sent an 
e-mail
 >     asking to again be subscribed to the Syndicate mailing list. (What nn
 >     never bothered to realise was that subscription to the list had 
always
 >     been open so that, at any point, it could have subscribed itself 
- we have
 >     always wondered why Majordomo is such a blind spot in this 
technophile
 >     entity's arsenal.) After getting assurances from nn that she was 
not out
 >     to misuse the list, we subscribed it to the Syndicate list.
 >
 >     Naively, as we had to realise. nn went from one or two messages 
every day
 >     in February to an average of three to five message in April and up to
 >     eight and ten messages per day in May and June - and that on a 
list which
 >     had a regular daily traffic of three to five messages a day. The
 >     distributed nature of the nn collective makes it possible for 
them to keep
 >     posting 24 hours a day - great for promoting your online presence,
 >     irritating for people who have a less frantic life rhythm. nn's 
messages
 >     are always cryptic, sometimes amusing, often tediously repetitive 
in their
 >     quirky rhetorics and style, and generally irritating for the 
majority of
 >     people. Its activity on the Syndicate - like on many other lists 
it has
 >     used and terrorised - soon came to look like a hijack. But the 
sheer mass
 >     of traffic nn was generating, the sheer amount of nn's presence, was
 >     overwhelming. Perhaps this phenomenon could be compared to SMEGL, 
short
 >     for super mental grid lock, a term that was developed to describe 
traffic
 >     jam situations in NYC back in the eighties (or was this term 
coined in
 >     Berlin-Kreuzberg's famous Fischbuero? Who knows, the boundaries get
 >     blurred...).
 >
 >     In the spring of 2001, nn's and other people's activities who use 
open,
 >     unmoderated mailing lists for promulgating their self-promotional 
e-mails,
 >     triggered discussions about 'spam art', on Syndicate as well as 
on other
 >     lists. Actually, given the extreme openness and vulnerability of a
 >     structure like the Syndicate it remains quite astonishing that this
 >     structure survived for such a long time. What happened in the 
course of
 >     2000/2001 (not only to Syndicate, but also to several other 
mailing lists)
 >     was that the openness of these lists, i.e. the fact that they were
 >     unmoderated, was massively abused, and, finally, destroyed, by 
relentless
 >     'creative' spamming. One of the basic principles of the Internet 
- its
 >     openness - suddenly seemed to become a mere tool for attacking 
this very
 >     principle. 'Netiquette' did not seem to be of much value anymore 
and was
 >     sacrificed for the egotistical self-expression of (distributed) 
artist
 >     egos. The irony of this process is that, like any good parasite, this
 >     artistic practice depends on the existence of lively online 
communities:
 >     it not only bites, but kills the hand that feeds it. - These parasite
 >     nomads will find new hosts, no doubt, but they have over the past 
year
 >     helped to erode the social fabric of the wider net cultural 
population so
 >     much that communities have to protect themselves from attacks and 
hijacks
 >     more aggressively than before. Their adolescent carelessness is 
partly
 >     responsible for the withering of the romantic utopia of a 
completely open,
 >     sociable online environment. However educational that may be, we 
despise
 >     the deliberation with which these people act.
 >
 >     nn got unsubscribed from the Syndicate without warning on a day 
when there
 >     had been nothing but ten messages from her. After some days of 
silence and
 >     sighs of relief, angry protests by nn came through. On the list,
 >     accusations of censorship and/or dictatorship were made. A small 
but noisy
 >     faction denounced unsubscribing nn as an act against the freedom of
 >     speech. They called the administrators fascists, murderers, and
 >     'threatened' to report the case to 'Index on Censorship'. While 
some other
 >     list members welcomed the departure of nn on and off the list and the
 >     admin team again and again explained their move, the ludicrous 
allegations
 >     and vociferous insults continued.
 >
 >     The real shock for us was that the majority of list subscribers 
did not
 >     participate in the discussion and thus silently seemed to accept 
what was
 >     going on. It was personally hurtful not to receive more support 
against
 >     the insults raised against us, but more frustrating was the 
indifference
 >     that made the whole process possible. Within few days, the 
alienation from
 >     the atmosphere on the list was so great that we admitted defeat,
 >     re-subscribed nn and began to withdraw from the Syndicate. The 
list was
 >     moved to a different server and is now administered by other 
people at
 >     anart.no/~syndicate. We wanted to avoid further verbiage and 
conflict and
 >     therefore gave up the name, but we insist that from our 
perspective the
 >     Syndicate project that was founded in 1996 ended in August 2001. What
 >     remains under its name is a zombie kept alive by misconceptions 
about what
 >     the Syndicate really was. Maybe we should have stopped the project
 >     altogether in the summer?
 >
 >     Filtering has, in a way, done us in. Before there were effective 
e-mail
 >     clients that could filter out lists and other mail communication,
 >     everybody on the list got everything more or less instantly, 
which also
 >     meant a higher level of social awareness and social control of 
what goes
 >     on on the list. Today, many people filter the lists they 
subscribe to and
 >     only look at the postings at irregular intervals - some mailboxes 
don't
 >     get opened for months. Like this, people consume the list 
passively and do
 >     not even notice a fiasco like the one that we experienced on the 
Syndicate
 >     list in the summer. I guess that some people who remain 
subscribed to the
 >     Syndicate list still have not noticed that anything has changed. 
For a
 >     social community, that kind of behaviour - automated deferance - 
can be
 >     fatal."
 >
 > <nettime> Rise and Decline of the Syndicate
 >     http://www.nettime.org/Lists-Archives/nettime-l-0111/msg00077.html
 >
 >     wishing all well.
 >
 >     marc
 >
 >
 >
 > > Interesting, it reminds me about doctress Neutopia,
 > >
 >     
http://projectwhitehouse.wordpress.com/democrats/libby-hubbard-aka-doctress-neutopia-free-the-slaves
 > > a selfnamed prophet and the founder of a new religion at the
 >     beginning of the Net, around 1995.
 > > She terrorized many online communities and was expelled from many 
forums.
 > > Ana
 > >
 > > On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 3:25 PM, marc garrett
 > <marc.garr...@furtherfield.org> wrote:
 > >
 > >     Netochka Nezvanova.
 > >
 > >     One of the most famous and infamous EccentricCharacters in
 > >     turn–of–the–21st Century Western artistic NetworkCulture, Netochka
 > >     Nezvanova (aka N.N., antiorp, integer, Irena Sabine Czubera)
 >     remains an
 > >     enigma to many. Widely believed to be an IdentityCollective?,
 >     Netochka
 > >     Nezvanova is a PenName named after the title character in [an early
 > >     unfinished Fyodor Dostoevsky novel] whose name means "nameless
 >     nobody"
 > >     in Russian. The identity always presents itself as female, though
 >     it may
 > >     not be in reality. Despite the meaning of her moniker, N.N. has
 >     coveted
 > >     attention and recognition like few others on the Internet.
 > >
 > >     http://meatballwiki.org/wiki/NetochkaNezvanova
 > >     _______________________________________________
 > >     NetBehaviour mailing list
 > >     NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 > >     http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > >
 > > --
 > > http://www.twitter.com/caravia15852
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/art-and-activism/
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/food-history-and-trivia
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/gender-issues/
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/literary-exiles/
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/museums-and-ethics/
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/urbanism-3-0
 > > http://www.scoop.it/t/postcolonial-mind/
 > >
 > > mobil/cell +4670-3213370
 > >
 > >
 > > "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth
 >     with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you
 >     will always long to return.
 > > — Leonardo da Vinci
 > >
 > >
 > > _______________________________________________
 > > NetBehaviour mailing list
 > > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 > > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 >
 >     _______________________________________________
 >     NetBehaviour mailing list
 >     NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 >     http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour
 >
 >
 >
 >
 > --
 > http://www.twitter.com/caravia15852
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/art-and-activism/
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/food-history-and-trivia
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/gender-issues/
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/literary-exiles/
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/museums-and-ethics/
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/urbanism-3-0
 > http://www.scoop.it/t/postcolonial-mind/
 >
 > mobil/cell +4670-3213370
 >
 >
 > "When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth 
with your eyes turned skyward, for there you have been and there you 
will always long to return.
 > — Leonardo da Vinci
 >
 >
 > _______________________________________________
 > NetBehaviour mailing list
 > NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
 > http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

_______________________________________________
NetBehaviour mailing list
NetBehaviour@netbehaviour.org
http://www.netbehaviour.org/mailman/listinfo/netbehaviour

Reply via email to