Milos, Thanks for bringing this up. I have been wanting to ask someone about the differences between autofs and supermount, whether they rely on each other or compete. I am sure that I have loaded both at the same time in the past, and maybe have gotten quirky result because of this. Can you explain to me the true differences in the way they operate, if any, and if the end result "looks" any different between them? (when supermount is working, of course)
TIA T ----- Original Message ----- From: "Milos Prudek" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, November 22, 2002 2:23 PM Subject: Re: [newbie] First suspect - me > > Its wrong for mandrake to expect poeple to just wait for the next version to > fix such a huge bug.. > > particularly when supermount was one of the touted "benefits" of mandrake > over tbe others.. I agree 100% I'm using autofs because supermount does not work reliably. I'm a former RedHat user. I used RedHat 5.2, 6.2 and 7.1 as desktop systems. This is my first Mandrake. Mandrake is good, but supermount needs fixing ASAP. -- Milos Prudek ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
