On Thursday 03 Apr 2003 1:33 pm, pete wrote: > On Thursda> > I've never had problems with burning data disks until I tried to burn > > this bootable one, which is why I thought it was linked with the boot > > image. I normally add directories and files to the list, excluding > > unnecessary ones if the collection is too big. If the last tab can > > calculate the sum without errors they burn fine - though it pays to burn > > at slowish speeds - 8x is right for most people. I don't burn to an > > image, I burn straight to disk, and it works. > > > > Anne > Hi, Pete
> There are two options, one is to create an ISO image on your disk and burn > from that (my preference as it avoids buffer underruns), the other is to > create an ISO image and burn to CD-R(RW) on the fly. In neither case do > you burn an ISO image. > Semantics. IIRC both Nero and Roxio refer to the process as 'burn an image'. We both know what they mean. > The CD writing HOWTO explains how to create a bootable disk and in XCDRoast > the 'master tracks/boot options' tab allows you to specify that it is a > bootable CD ROM and identify the boot image etc. I've been burning disks for years, so I understand the process. In this context Douglas has said that he had been unable to burn a data disk (not a bootable one, such as I was having a problem with) in XCDRoast. The point I was making was that I frequently burn data disks under XCDRoast and have always found it reliable, even though I normally burn 'on the fly'. Anne -- Registered Linux User No.293302
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com