I use win2000 for work every day, (in fact I am writing this email using it.)
It has service pack 2 and all updates,, and I crash it twice a day without fail,, i use my OS's very hard, and for long periods, I have been working at this box for 15 hours straight now, with an average 10 different programs happening... Win98 used to crash totally every hour, win2000 crashes totally twice a night.. not perfect but much better then 98.. neither work anywhere near as well as linux, my test box is a low end Ppro200 with 48mb of ram, and it served 7 domains for both website and email, scanned all email (3-4k daily) for virus's.. and shared the net to the network downstairs, ran portsentry and a firewall and several other apps, all on that crappy system and it lasted 3 months before I had to go in and restart some services... So I have a high opinion of linux for that reason... rgds Frank -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Hokanson Jr. Sent: Tuesday, 23 October 2001 9:49 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [newbie] Mac vs Intel architecture deliberations On Monday 22 October 2001 06:02 pm, you wrote: > Hi everyone. > > I´ve been playing with linux (ML8.1) for a little > while on my home machine (an old P166). Our family is > getting to the point where we need a second machine, > so I´m trying to decide on the merits of going with a > PowerPC (Mac) architecture (perhaps a new Mac G4) > instead of Intel. I forsee my current machine being > used primarily as a linux box (file/print server, > database server, secondary desktop for me). We would > use the newer machine as the primary (user-friendly) > desktop that all family members will be comfortable > using. > > One of the things about the Mac that caught my > attention was that its new OS X is basically another > Unix variant. Aside from being more stable than > Windows, Im hoping that each machine would be able to > easily mount the others file systems. If that's the only reason, I would have to decline. Windows 2000 (not 9x) is already fairly stable, and there's the old argument about software availability. On the other hand, if you're thinking about games and educational software (with stability still a concern), the Mac might look attractive vis a vis the Win2k box. My advice would be to dual boot one or more of your machines with a Linux/Win2K combo. I presently have no opinion of Windows XP. I have yet to use it. - John
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
