This may be on hold, http://www.infoq.com/news/2008/06/Open-Source-Violations
On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:24 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll volunteer for the sandcastle plugin, just put the whip down. > > -Evan > > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >> It sounds as though we need to start getting people off of 0.14 and this >> means moving the Visual Studio work into trunk. I checked Sandcastle and >> it >> looks as though Microsoft finally put it under open-source, so that's one >> area we can tackle for API doc generation. Any volunteers for Sandcastle >> plugin? >> >> We also have toolchains as of Maven 2.0.9. I added the NMaven support for >> toolchains into the trunk, but there still is a fair amount we need to do >> to >> fully leverage it. I've got some Maven related work and then am scheduled >> for the .NET support for Nexus. After that, I'll be jumping into NMaven a >> lot more. I think Evan is doing likewise, after he does his insane San >> Francisco to LA bicycle ride next month (assuming he survives). So next >> month, I expect we will have a lot more activity and start trying to build >> the community and hopefully get in more committers. I know a lot of people >> have submitted patches. Thanks for that. We will get it all sorted out. >> >> Shane >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 4:04 PM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > Hi Evan, >> > >> > We definitely require full IDE integration for Visual Studio, as well as >> > solution generation, pom generation from an existing solution file, and >> > support for signed assemblies.?Generation of the XML docs is another >> feature >> > we'd love to see.? >> > The developer community that I'm trying to support doesn't want to leave >> > the IDE if at all possible, but we would love to pull them into the >> > Maven-based environment that we currently use for Java builds. >> > >> > Shane - thanks for the update.? Keep that whip cracking! ;-) >> > >> > -- Caulene >> > >> > -----Original Message----- >> > From: Shane Isbell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > To: [email protected] >> > Sent: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 2:45 pm >> > Subject: Re: Graduation? >> > >> > >> > >> > We are getting there. We have a release under our belt. We just need to >> > prove that we have a healthy, sustainable developer community before we >> > can >> > graduate. Cracks whip over Evan's back ;) >> > >> > Shane >> > >> > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 2:34 PM, Evan Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > Hi Caulene, >> > > >> > > It would be helpful to understand how your company plans to use >> NMaven. >> > > E.g. compile, test, package, etc. Is there missing functionality that >> > you >> > > would require, such as IDE integration or solution file generation? >> > > >> > > (Note: I'm letting Shane handle the graduation question :) ) >> > > >> > > Thanks for the feedback, >> > > Evan >> > > >> > > On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:28 AM, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Hi Shane, >> > > > >> > > > I'm trying to implement NMaven within my company, and there are >> > concerns >> > > > that NMaven is still an incubator project.? What are the remaining >> > > barriers >> > > > for graduation from the incubator, and is there an estimated >> > timeline?? >> > > How >> > > > can we help? >> > > > >> > > > Thanks, >> > > > Caulene >> > > > >> > > >> > >> > >> > >
