Very cool, and the Mantra to Nuke tool looks interesting too.

On 29 January 2014 10:19, Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes <[email protected]>wrote:

>  This looks awesome. Downloading now.
>
> I checked out your website Theodore and the Mantra tools also look really
> cool.
>
> Neil Rögnvaldr Scholes
> www.neilscholes.com
>
> On 29/01/14 13:21, theodor groeneboom wrote:
>
> Thats great to hear! I'm just waiting for Frank to approve the latest
> upload.
>
>  Sprut on.
>
>
> On 29 January 2014 13:19, Martin Constable <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Theo
>>
>> The Bug is still there in the copy from Nukepedia. However, this is prob
>> because the copy on the server has not refreshed (or something).
>>
>> The copy I edited myself is behaving well and getting sweeeeet results.
>>
>> martin
>>
>>
>> On 29 Jan, 2014, at 8:43 PM, theodor groeneboom <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>  > Martin, Ari & Ron, I've re-uploaded the file on Nukepedia. Let me
>> know if this one works, as I havn't seen this bug before.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29 January 2014 12:25, theodor groeneboom <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi Ron, it seems Martin discovered this bug first. I've forgot to round
>> a float value to an int. Try replacing line 24 in the executeSim python
>> script with "task.setProgress(int(progress))".
>> > I'll update the nukepedia file over lunch to include this.
>> >
>> >
>> > On 29 January 2014 12:21, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > Indeed, wonderful stuff Theo. Well done.
>> > I tried your examples and didn't get much joy, though.
>> > Everything is fine until I read the Solver, and the resolution after
>> that turns to 256x256. I opened up the Group and it seemed to me the
>> problem was with the cache. I placed a new path for the cache and hit the
>> cache button and got the attached error.
>> >
>> > Anything you can help here?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > R
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ron Ganbar
>> > email: [email protected]
>> > tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>> >      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>> > url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 2:09 PM, Ari Rubenstein <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> > Theodor
>> >
>> > This is excellent, thank you for your efforts. I've wanted a 2d fluid
>> sim in nuke for awhile, I can think of several uses.
>> >
>> > Going to try it out shortly, I'll provide feedback.
>> >
>> > Ari
>> > Blue Sky
>> >
>> >
>> > Sent from my iPhone
>> >
>> > On Jan 29, 2014, at 4:33 AM, theodor groeneboom <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Nuke-list,
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I spent some time earlier this year putting together a 2d fluid sim
>> "framework" using gizmos. I've used it on a few shows and personal work and
>> it seems to be fairly stable and lots of fun to use.
>> >>
>> >> <sprut_banner.jpg>
>> >>
>> >> I've abstracted Jos Stam's 1999 Siggraph paper "Stable Fluids" into
>> Nuke's own nodes, making it a gizmo-centric fluid simulator. Its very easy
>> to extend and learn from looking at the internals, something I hope the
>> Nuke community will benefit from.
>> >>
>> >> <image12.gif><image00.gif>
>> >>
>> >> There's currently three nodes, SprutEmitter, SprutSolver and a
>> diagnostics tool SprutInspect.
>> >> I hope by releasing it to the public, other Nuke artists will pick it
>> up and contribute to the system, and keep on sharing it.
>> >>
>> >> You can find the gizmos, docs and example scripts here :
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Its compatible with all three platforms, and most versions of Nuke. No
>> install requirements, just copy and paste the nodes around like usual.
>> >>
>> >> I also want to give a shout out to Andre Hitsøy, Lucien Fostier &
>> Michael Ralla for contributions and greideas!
>> >>
>> >> -theo
>> >>
>> >> www.euqahuba.com
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> Nuke-users mailing list
>> >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nuke-users mailing list
>> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nuke-users mailing list
>> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Nuke-users mailing list
>> > [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> > http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nuke-users mailing list
>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing [email protected], 
> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to