sorry guys for the hebrew, that was meant for Ron, Thanks for the tips, i'll test it with -m 16 cores and see what happens.
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:19 PM, itai bachar <[email protected]> wrote: > תודה. > דה פאונדרי לא שמעו על WINDOWS? > זה די נפוץ... > לא מצליח להתחבר למיילינג ניוז הזה. > > > On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Windows in this case. >> >> >> >> Ron Ganbar >> email: [email protected] >> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >> >> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neil Scholes <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Ron, >>> >>> I'm curious is that on linux? Thinking about new machine so processor >>> choice is on my mind...... >>> >>> Sent from my iPad >>> >>> On 7 Dec 2014, at 20:07, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> I would expect a piece of software like Nuke to, well, push and make use >>> of everything available. It really feels odd to me that The Foundry aren't >>> taking care of this. >>> Thanks for the tips. I'll pass them on. >>> >>> R >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Ron Ganbar >>> email: [email protected] >>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >>> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >>> >>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Randy Little <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Yeah or just hit x in the dag and type "set threads" see if its using >>>> virtual cores. If it is try "set threads (physical cores)" so "set >>>> threads 16" if thats even the case. >>>> >>>> Randy S. Little >>>> http://www.rslittle.com/ >>>> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/ >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Rusch <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Nuke has (always had?) performance problems on machines with many >>>>> virtual cores. First thing I would try is running Nuke with `-m 16` on the >>>>> Xeon box. >>>>> >>>>> -Nathan >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *From:* Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> >>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 6:21 AM >>>>> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]> >>>>> *Subject:* [Nuke-users] (no subject) >>>>> >>>>> Hey guys >>>>> A friend is testing a dual Xeon e5 2689 64GB gtx970 vs his old i7 >>>>> 3930K 32GB gtx680, (both reading/writing to a same spec ssd running >>>>> windows). >>>>> Just so happens that the old single cpu pc is faster at rendering, >>>>> around 5%-30% than the dual xeon machine. Interactivity is also slightly >>>>> faster on the i7. (the xeon redraws a bit slower when you go to a new >>>>> frame >>>>> on the timeline). >>>>> When rendering in Maya, he gets the expected 105-115% speed gain (more >>>>> than twice as fast) from the xeon's. >>>>> Seems very odd. How come? Anything we're missing here? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Ron Ganbar >>>>> email: [email protected] >>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK] >>>>> +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel] >>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/ >>>>> >>>>> ------------------------------ >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Nuke-users mailing list >>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Nuke-users mailing list >>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Nuke-users mailing list >> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ >> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users >> > >
_______________________________________________ Nuke-users mailing list [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/ http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
