Ok I checked with the xeons on 16 threads only,
now they lag behind the i7 for 10-12% only...
this is very weird.


On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:38 PM, itai bachar <[email protected]> wrote:

> sorry guys for the hebrew, that was meant for Ron,
> Thanks for the tips, i'll test it with -m 16 cores and see what happens.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:19 PM, itai bachar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> תודה.
>> דה פאונדרי לא שמעו על WINDOWS?
>> זה די נפוץ...
>> לא מצליח להתחבר למיילינג ניוז הזה.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Windows in this case.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Ron Ganbar
>>> email: [email protected]
>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neil Scholes <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Ron,
>>>>
>>>> I'm curious is that on linux? Thinking about new machine so processor
>>>> choice is on my mind......
>>>>
>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>
>>>> On 7 Dec 2014, at 20:07, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I would expect a piece of software like Nuke to, well, push and make
>>>> use of everything available. It really feels odd to me that The Foundry
>>>> aren't taking care of this.
>>>> Thanks for the tips. I'll pass them on.
>>>>
>>>> R
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Ron Ganbar
>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Randy Little <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Yeah or just hit x in the dag and type "set threads"   see if its
>>>>> using virtual cores.  If it is try "set threads (physical cores)"   so 
>>>>> "set
>>>>> threads 16"  if thats even the case.
>>>>>
>>>>> Randy S. Little
>>>>> http://www.rslittle.com/
>>>>> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Rusch <[email protected]
>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>   Nuke has (always had?) performance problems on machines with many
>>>>>> virtual cores. First thing I would try is running Nuke with `-m 16` on 
>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Xeon box.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Nathan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  *From:* Ron Ganbar <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 6:21 AM
>>>>>> *To:* Nuke user discussion <[email protected]>
>>>>>> *Subject:* [Nuke-users] (no subject)
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Hey guys
>>>>>> A friend is testing a dual Xeon e5 2689 64GB gtx970 vs his old i7
>>>>>> 3930K 32GB gtx680, (both reading/writing to a same spec ssd running
>>>>>> windows).
>>>>>> Just so happens that the old single cpu pc is faster at rendering,
>>>>>> around 5%-30% than the dual xeon machine. Interactivity is also slightly
>>>>>> faster on the i7. (the xeon redraws a bit slower when you go to a new 
>>>>>> frame
>>>>>> on the timeline).
>>>>>> When rendering in Maya, he gets the expected 105-115% speed gain
>>>>>> (more than twice as fast) from the xeon's.
>>>>>> Seems very odd. How come? Anything we're missing here?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ron Ganbar
>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>>>>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to