the machine has 2 xeon e5 2689's, 8 cores each.
so that's 16 physical cores,
should I do -m 16?
thanks

On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Deke Kincaid <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi itai
>
> Is that 16 physical or virtual cores?  If it's virtual then you should do
> it for the physical ones -m 8.
>
>
> On Monday, December 8, 2014, itai bachar <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> Ok I checked with the xeons on 16 threads only,
>> now they lag behind the i7 for 10-12% only...
>> this is very weird.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:38 PM, itai bachar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> sorry guys for the hebrew, that was meant for Ron,
>>> Thanks for the tips, i'll test it with -m 16 cores and see what happens.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 4:19 PM, itai bachar <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> תודה.
>>>> דה פאונדרי לא שמעו על WINDOWS?
>>>> זה די נפוץ...
>>>> לא מצליח להתחבר למיילינג ניוז הזה.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Windows in this case.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Ron Ganbar
>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>>>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 2:50 PM, Neil Scholes <[email protected]>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Ron,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm curious is that on linux? Thinking about new machine so processor
>>>>>> choice is on my mind......
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sent from my iPad
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 7 Dec 2014, at 20:07, Ron Ganbar <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would expect a piece of software like Nuke to, well, push and make
>>>>>> use of everything available. It really feels odd to me that The Foundry
>>>>>> aren't taking care of this.
>>>>>> Thanks for the tips. I'll pass them on.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> R
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Ron Ganbar
>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>>>>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Randy Little <[email protected]
>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yeah or just hit x in the dag and type "set threads"   see if its
>>>>>>> using virtual cores.  If it is try "set threads (physical cores)"   so 
>>>>>>> "set
>>>>>>> threads 16"  if thats even the case.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Randy S. Little
>>>>>>> http://www.rslittle.com/
>>>>>>> http://www.imdb.com/name/nm2325729/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 2:14 PM, Nathan Rusch <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Nuke has (always had?) performance problems on machines with
>>>>>>>> many virtual cores. First thing I would try is running Nuke with `-m 
>>>>>>>> 16` on
>>>>>>>> the Xeon box.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Nathan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  *From:* Ron Ganbar
>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Sunday, December 07, 2014 6:21 AM
>>>>>>>> *To:* Nuke user discussion
>>>>>>>> *Subject:* [Nuke-users] (no subject)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Hey guys
>>>>>>>> A friend is testing a dual Xeon e5 2689 64GB gtx970 vs his old i7
>>>>>>>> 3930K 32GB gtx680, (both reading/writing to a same spec ssd running
>>>>>>>> windows).
>>>>>>>> Just so happens that the old single cpu pc is faster at rendering,
>>>>>>>> around 5%-30% than the dual xeon machine. Interactivity is also 
>>>>>>>> slightly
>>>>>>>> faster on the i7. (the xeon redraws a bit slower when you go to a new 
>>>>>>>> frame
>>>>>>>> on the timeline).
>>>>>>>> When rendering in Maya, he gets the expected 105-115% speed gain
>>>>>>>> (more than twice as fast) from the xeon's.
>>>>>>>> Seems very odd. How come? Anything we're missing here?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Ron Ganbar
>>>>>>>> email: [email protected]
>>>>>>>> tel: +44 (0)7968 007 309 [UK]
>>>>>>>>      +972 (0)54 255 9765 [Israel]
>>>>>>>> url: http://ronganbar.wordpress.com/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> ------------------------------
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected],
>>>>>>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>>> [email protected],
>>>>>>>> http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Nuke-users mailing list
>>>>> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
>>>>> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> -----
> Deke Kincaid
> M&E OEM Development Manager
> The Foundry
> Mobile: (310) 883 4313
> Tel: (310) 399 4555 - Fax: (310) 450 4516
>
> _______________________________________________
> Nuke-users mailing list
> [email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
> http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users
>
_______________________________________________
Nuke-users mailing list
[email protected], http://forums.thefoundry.co.uk/
http://support.thefoundry.co.uk/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/nuke-users

Reply via email to