On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 4:27 PM Ilhan Polat <ilhanpo...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The reason why I mentioned GH discussions is that literally everybody who
> is engaged with the code, is familiar with the format, included in the
> codebase product and has replies in built unlike the Discourse (opinion is
> mine) useless flat discussion design where replies are all over the place
> just like the mailing list in case you are not using a tree view supporting
> client. Hence topic hijacking is one of the main usability difficulties of
> emails.
>
> The goal here is to have a coherent engagement with everyone not just
> within a small circle, such that there is indeed a discussion happening
> rather than a few people chiming in. It would be a nice analytics exercise
> to have how many active users using these lists. I'd say 20-25 max for
> contribs and team members which is really not much. I know some people are
> still using IRC and mailing lists but I wouldn't argue that these are the
> modern media to have proper engaging discussions. "Who said to whom" is the
> bread and butter of such discussions. And I do think that discourse is
> exactly the same thing with mailing lists with a slightly better UI while
> virtually everyone else in the world is doing replies.
>

(There are probably a lot of users like myself who follow the mailing list
discussions but rarely feel the need to speak up themselves. Not that this
says much either way in the discussion, just pointing it out).

I'm not intimately familiar with github discussions (I've only used it a
few times), but as far as I can tell it only has answers (or "comments")
and comments (or "replies") on answers, i.e. 2 levels of replies rather
than a flat single level of replies. If this is indeed the case then I'm
not sure it's that much better than a flat system, since when things really
get hairy then 2 levels are probably also insufficient to ensure "who said
to whom". The "clear replies" argument would hold stronger (in my
peanut-gallery opinion) for a medium that supports full reply trees like
many comment sections do on various websites.

AndrĂ¡s


> I would be willing to help with the objections raised since I have been
> using GH discussions for quite a while now and there are many tools
> available for administration of the discussions. For example,
>
>
> https://github.blog/changelog/2021-09-14-notification-emails-for-discussions/
>
> is a recent feature. I don't work for GitHub obviously and have nothing to
> do with them but the reasons I'm willing to hear about.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 3:07 PM Matthew Brett <matthew.br...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 1:57 PM Rohit Goswami <rgosw...@quansight.com>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > I guess then the approach overall would evolve to something like using
>> the mailing list to announce discourse posts which need input. Though I
>> would assume that the web interface essentially makes the mailing list
>> almost like discourse, even for new users.
>> >
>> > The real issue IMO is still the moderation efforts and additional
>> governance needed for maintaining discourse.
>>
>> Yes - that was what I meant.   I do see that mailing lists are harder
>> to moderate, in that once the email has gone out, it is difficult to
>> revoke.  So is the argument just that you *can* moderate on Discourse,
>> therefore you need to think about it more?  Do we have any reason to
>> think that more moderation will in fact be needed?  We've needed very
>> little so far on the mailing list, as far as I can see.
>>
>> Chers,
>>
>> Matthew
>> _______________________________________________
>> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
>> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
>> Member address: ilhanpo...@gmail.com
>>
> _______________________________________________
> NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
> Member address: deak.and...@gmail.com
>
_______________________________________________
NumPy-Discussion mailing list -- numpy-discussion@python.org
To unsubscribe send an email to numpy-discussion-le...@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/numpy-discussion.python.org/
Member address: arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to