> I registered those two domains and pointed them to the FAQ > because Ryan let them languish for eight or nine months and > I was afraid someone unscrupulous would take them and point > them to a purely commercial site. Hmmm, you didn't even consider sending Ryan an email to voice that concern? Instead you jumped in and pointed them to your own site... as evidenced by the "Back to Earth 1066" at the bottom of the page. Personally, I think it's unethical at best. There's nothing wrong with hosting an unofficial FAQ on your site, but grabbing those domains and directing them as you have is unnice. It would be a nice gesture on your part right now if your motivation was as you said, to transfer those domains over to Ryan. If you aren't willing to do that yet, at least remove the links to your own site. Wayne
- Re: Domain Abuse (wa... Doug Meerschaert
- Re: Domain Abuse (wa... Mike Looney
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Brad Thompson
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l]... Tim Dugger
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d2... Brad Thompson
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Infinite Possibilities
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l]... Grok
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d2... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Woodman, Wayne 709 724-6101
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Margaret C Vining
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... John J. Kaufman
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Natalie G. Stockard
