Faustus von Goethe wrote: > Hurrah! Another letter of support. ::sniff:: [you guys are chokin' > me up] For the curious, I think Faust is just fine where he is. The *only* way that he could be in the wrong was if he refused an offer to sell-at-cost the domains. Ryan should have checked his concern himself, and is "suffering" for it. Faust saw the open domains, and registered them, thus pointing some traffic to his own site, and profiting from his move. (Go you!) BTW, I've had almost no contact with Faust outside of this list. He's sent me some good tips on the FAQ, and one of these days when I have spare time I'm going to go through and consolidate parts from his FAQ into "mine.." DM >
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d2... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Woodman, Wayne 709 724-6101
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Margaret C Vining
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... John J. Kaufman
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Natalie G. Stockard
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Chris
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Mike Looney
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- [ogf-d20-l] Simple question(s) Max Skibinsky
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Simple question(s) Doug Meerschaert
- Re: [ogf-d20-l] Simple question(s... Max Skibinsky
