>Your efforts will certainly appear more altruistic as long as you do not >gain commercial advantage from it. What on earth is WotC trying to do? Yes, they 'own' the OGF, but the whole point was to promote and encourage the purchase of their d20 products. I think he has a right to link his other products to a site he is maintaining. It doesn't hurt the OGF, and since this stuff is free, WotC can't dictate or restrict how he uses the open gaming content (that's what copyleft means). I found the FAQ very useful and very comprehensive, and it is a good thing to have out there. Give him a break. One would think you're just jealous that you didn't think of it first. p
|
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Brad Thompson
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l]... Tim Dugger
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d2... Brad Thompson
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [og... Infinite Possibilities
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l]... Grok
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d2... Tim Dugger
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Woodman, Wayne 709 724-6101
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Tim Dugger
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Lynn Fredricks
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Pax Harmonica
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Margaret C Vining
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... John J. Kaufman
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ... Doug Meerschaert
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- RE: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Natalie G. Stockard
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Faustus von Goethe
- Re: Domain Abuse (was RE: [ogf-d20-l] FAQ) Chris
