I've been notified of use by three or four people (some for multiple products). My intent---and I've been a bit lax on carrying this out---is to add a "Known Prometheus Products" section to the site.
Tom Caudron Administrator of the Prometheus Project http://www.PrometheusGaming.com On Thu, 2006-08-17 at 07:50 -0700, Chris Helton wrote: > Tom, > > Out of curiosity, who is using this Prometheus logo/license? Outside of this > list I've never seen it. > > Chris Helton > > ----- Original Message ---- > From: Tom Caudron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org > Sent: Thursday, August 17, 2006 10:16:43 AM > Subject: Re: [Ogf-l] Re: OGL Logo > > > Clark said, ""Terms" may not change, but enforcement sure does." > > The Prometheus project violates no part of the OGL of which I am aware, > which was the implied claim of the original email to which I was > replying. In the context of that comment, I have to stand by my claim. > Future kings in the Halls of WotC may not like the OGL and the d20SRD, > but the terms of the license are what they are. There exists no term > violations to enforce. In other words, if Prometheus violates some > arcane misunderstood term of the OGL, so do the rest of you (as nothing > Prometheus does is unknown in whole or in part in many other works) and > we have all based our respective products/projects on a misunderstanding > of the OGL---which would be unfortunate. > > I tend to believe that amongst all the various lawyers all of us have > spoken with, at least one of them would have raised the red flag if the > terms of the OGL were somehow dangerously mercurial or if there were > enforcement leeway on those terms that made them so. > > Notwithstanding an out-of-the-blue unfounded claim from WotC (something > outlandish like the SCO/Linux lawsuit claims), I do not believe, nor do > I think you believe, that WotC has the ability to enforce the OGL in > a /wildly/ different manner than that which we understand and expect. > > Now the d20STL is another matter entirely, and that is the very point > that caused me to move to an alternative to that logo/license. > > Tom Caudron > > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l > _______________________________________________ > Ogf-l mailing list > Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org > http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l _______________________________________________ Ogf-l mailing list Ogf-l@mail.opengamingfoundation.org http://mail.opengamingfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/ogf-l
