>From: "Faustus von Goethe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

>Personally, this is my opinion also.  I >strongly< believe that such an
>archive would AT WORST cost the producer a couple of measley sales to other
>developers.

I have to agree.  :)  My reason is simple: If anyone's foolish enough to 
depend on their OGC to make a sale, the product's busted.  They should chalk 
it off as a learning experince, thank themselves for being cautious and for 
what money they've gotten, and be more careful next time.

Or in other words: If OGC costs them sales, this database isn't going to 
cost them a heck of a lot more than the OGL by itself.

>  IMO it would foster rather than hinder sales - because the use
>of OGL would be advanced, and this is good for everybody - more choices for
>the consumer, a bigger market, and more interest.
>
>A rising tide lifts EVERYBODY.

:)  And with the OGC, and common rules, we're *ALL* in the same sea, even if 
our boats are of different sizes.  :)

>To use an analogy, without artwork, layout, and PI it would be as if all
>that NAPSTER ever did was post recordings of William F. Buckley reading
>Motley Crue's and Metallica's lyrics in a dry monotone.
>
>Might make interesting listening for a while, but I don't think it would
>impact sales een a little.

:)  Perfect analogy.  This is song lyrics (the background stuff to the 
product), not the final recording (the real juicy stuff that the public will 
spend lots of money on.)


DM
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at 
http://profiles.msn.com.

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org

Reply via email to