RE: [Open_Gaming] Non-D20 Reference Documents

[Nicholas H.M. Caldwell]

On Fri, 20 Oct 2000, Doug Meerschaert wrote:
> 
> Make the valuable content PI.  *That's why it's in the OGL!*
> 
> Well, not the stats... but the names and descriptions are *perfect* for 
> making PI.  I'd suggest that you come up with "placeholder" names if you PI 
> just names, but that's all.

Or we put the D20 stats in OGC boxes, we mark the names as PI, and
everything else lives outside the OGC boxes as fully closed
material. Ruthlessly conservative, but safe.

> Question: Are yout thinking of converting to d20?  If not, wouldn't 
> rolemaster be rather tiffed at being OGL'd, even in part?  Wouldn't that 
> constitute a violation of the OGL?

I'm not quite sure I understand the thrust of the questions here.

Regards,
Nicholas HM Caldwell
General Editor for The Guild Companion
http://www.guildcompanion.com/

-------------
For more information, please link to www.opengamingfoundation.org