On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 1:16 PM, Mike Hearn <m...@plan99.net> wrote:
> this may mean, people who do this must work with a patched JDK in the >> future. >> > > Right. But I think that's going to be more and more common in future. If > you rely on people installing proprietary stuff like JWS or applets then > it's a bleak future, as the way forward is clearly bundled JREs. > > > patched != bundled. For us this would be quite a step back, having to maintain our JDK patches/builds. Bundling itself is fine in our business cases.
