On 2/2/08, Eddy Nigg (StartCom Ltd.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However if there are enough builders and developers for the MS platform and > it works better with MS compiler etc. then why not? But if nobody maintains > the code within reasonable time, I prefer to rely on MinGW or other OSS > tools.
I think I did not made my-self clear... There is nothing wrong it keeping *BOTH* options around! But the free option should be available as there are other projects which rely on this one and use this environment. Alon. _______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
