Jean-Michel Pouré - GOOZE wrote: > > Please understand that whatever you try to organize democratically > > will indeed be a fork. Open source is not democracy. > > Peter, you are shooting yourself a bullet in the foot.
This isn't about me. > As written before, some people really believe to own OpenSC. Something being written doesn't make it true. I further find it rather rich that you claim to know what someone else believes. > Do you mean OpenSC can be ruled with passwords and administrative > rigths? I mean that each and every open source project can be ruled by perfect patches! Democracy and passwords are equally irrelevant. Code is not. > Creating a non-profit organization will solve this isssue and make > sure OpenSC IS a democracy. This is an utter phallacy. An open source project can never be a democracy, and trying to create democracy is nothing but feelgood bureacracy. > When the project was handed over to Martin, there was no discussion > on governance and this needs to be fixed pretty soon. I find that quite offensive. Why don't you focus on the code? //Peter
pgpEXC98lyj3F.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ opensc-devel mailing list opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org http://www.opensc-project.org/mailman/listinfo/opensc-devel
