Shawn Walker <shawn.wal...@oracle.com> wrote:
> On 07/19/10 02:50 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> ...
> > If we add the inverted tsort algorith and a default prefix for packages
> > (e.g. http://schily.net/packages) and if we combine this with ZFS,
> > is there really something missing?
>
> For those interested in learning more about the dependency solver use by
> pkg(5) (integrated in build 128), read more here:
>
> http://blogs.sun.com/barts/entry/satisfaction
You don't seem to know that SchilliX has no problems to resolve dependencies
using tsort since several years.
tsort works for linker dependencies since 30 years the only difference is that
the output has to be reversed for packages.
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home) Jörg Schilling D-13353 Berlin
j...@cs.tu-berlin.de (uni)
joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de (work) Blog:
http://schily.blogspot.com/
URL: http://cdrecord.berlios.de/private/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily
_______________________________________________
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
