In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:27:27 -0400, Richard Salz 
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

rsalz> As for BSD/advertising dicussions, the SSLeay license is
rsalz> characterized as "BSD with copyright."  It's not pure BSD, and
rsalz> so whether or not the current BSD license has an advertising
rsalz> clause is not relevant.

Richard, you normally make sense, but reading this, I have to ask what
the hell you're talking about!  At this point, I fully expect you to
know what copyright is and what a license is.  Among others, there is
no such thing as "BSD with copyright" because that would imply there
is a "BSD *without* copyright", and unless BSD suddenly turned public
domain when I wasn't watching, that's just absurd.

Cheers,
Richard

-----
Please consider sponsoring my work on free software.
See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details.

-- 
Richard Levitte                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                                        http://richard.levitte.org/

"When I became a man I put away childish things, including
 the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up."
                                                -- C.S. Lewis
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to