In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:27:27 -0400, Richard Salz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
rsalz> As for BSD/advertising dicussions, the SSLeay license is rsalz> characterized as "BSD with copyright." It's not pure BSD, and rsalz> so whether or not the current BSD license has an advertising rsalz> clause is not relevant. Richard, you normally make sense, but reading this, I have to ask what the hell you're talking about! At this point, I fully expect you to know what copyright is and what a license is. Among others, there is no such thing as "BSD with copyright" because that would imply there is a "BSD *without* copyright", and unless BSD suddenly turned public domain when I wasn't watching, that's just absurd. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]