In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Tue, 16 May 2006 14:31:46 -0700, "David Schwartz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
davids> davids> > In message davids> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] davids> > com> on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:27:27 -0400, Richard Salz davids> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: davids> > davids> > rsalz> As for BSD/advertising dicussions, the SSLeay license is davids> > rsalz> characterized as "BSD with copyright." It's not pure BSD, and davids> > rsalz> so whether or not the current BSD license has an advertising davids> > rsalz> clause is not relevant. davids> > davids> > Richard, you normally make sense, but reading this, I have to ask what davids> > the hell you're talking about! At this point, I fully expect you to davids> > know what copyright is and what a license is. Among others, there is davids> > no such thing as "BSD with copyright" because that would imply there davids> > is a "BSD *without* copyright", and unless BSD suddenly turned public davids> > domain when I wasn't watching, that's just absurd. davids> davids> I think when he said "BSD with copyright" he meant davids> "BSD with advertising clause" or something similar. Ah... makes sense. Richard, sorry for the lash. I've been in x too many discussions where people don't understand the difference between copyright and license, and I guess it got to me. My appologies. Cheers, Richard ----- Please consider sponsoring my work on free software. See http://www.free.lp.se/sponsoring.html for details. -- Richard Levitte [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://richard.levitte.org/ "When I became a man I put away childish things, including the fear of childishness and the desire to be very grown up." -- C.S. Lewis ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
