> In message
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> com> on Tue, 16 May 2006 12:27:27 -0400, Richard Salz
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
> rsalz> As for BSD/advertising dicussions, the SSLeay license is
> rsalz> characterized as "BSD with copyright." It's not pure BSD, and
> rsalz> so whether or not the current BSD license has an advertising
> rsalz> clause is not relevant.
>
> Richard, you normally make sense, but reading this, I have to ask what
> the hell you're talking about! At this point, I fully expect you to
> know what copyright is and what a license is. Among others, there is
> no such thing as "BSD with copyright" because that would imply there
> is a "BSD *without* copyright", and unless BSD suddenly turned public
> domain when I wasn't watching, that's just absurd.
I think when he said "BSD with copyright" he meant "BSD with advertising
clause" or something similar.
DS
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List openssl-dev@openssl.org
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
