> should go under javax.se sorry ment javax.ee ! --- Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009:
> Von: Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de> > Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans -> Expert Group > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 18:08 > > Bob originally was interested in having IOC for SE also. > But from what I've seen so far, he is imho one of those who > requests that all the annotations should go under javax.se. > > To me this sounds more like 'oh this thing can't beat > guice, so it should be for EJB only which we do not use > anyway' ... > > Only my personal thoughts btw. > > LieGrue, > strub > > --- James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> > schrieb am Do, 16.4.2009: > > > Von: James Carman <jcar...@carmanconsulting.com> > > Betreff: Re: JSR 299 / WebBeans -> Expert Group > > An: openwebbeans-dev@incubator.apache.org > > Datum: Donnerstag, 16. April 2009, 15:01 > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:56 AM, > > Matthias Wessendorf <mat...@apache.org> > > wrote: > > > Does not hurt. Originally we were two as well. > Both > > from Shale > > > (James and I) > > > > Well, it wouldn't hurt to have someone else on there > that > > isn't a > > JSFer. From what I understand "Crazy Bob" is > > interested in allowing > > the use of JSR-299 in Java SE environments (meaning > > anywhere I guess) > > as well. > > > > > >
