----- Original Message ----- From: "Lukasz Kacperczyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: Lens Mount Progress
> I don't agree. Dynax 7 is a very different camera, built with a very > different philosophy. Actually this can be said about any other camera from any manufacturer. I believe every manufacturer makes different cameras with different philosophy:) And that's the point of comparing them to each other. The specs of the Dynax 7 place this camera together with the MZ-S in the same segment of the market. Nikon and Canon lack such cameras - I believe the EOS 5 falls into the same category but it's a very outdated camera which should rather be compared to the Z-1p or something... > Agreed. Still, for me, the advantages of the MZ-S are more important than > those of the Dynax 7 (that's why I bought the latter :-) You mean *the former*, don't you?:) For me the most importand advantage of the MZ-S is that it accepts all K-mount lenses. > That's the biggest advantage (especially in Poland where the MZ-S is > outrageously expensive). Indeed:(( > Disclaimer - I'm not saying the Dynax 7 is a bad camera. I'm saying that I > prefer the MZ-S. Of course. Regards Artur
