Frank Theriault wrote: > Along the lines of the Yashica that you mention, I've owned (in the very > distant past) a couple of Praktica (I think they were) LTL's. Big, > heavy, inelegant, but built like a tank. The metal focal plane shutter > was not too quiet, and I'm sure did cause a bit of vibration, but it was > sturdy. I had a Praktica LTL 3, which served quite well until I...uh...wore out the film transport. It was a very solid camera, and really not THAT ugly. Also, the shutter release was terifically placed for my hands, and the film loading system was absolutely a dream to use. -Aaron - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Re: suggested student cameras? William Wiseman
- Re: suggested student cameras? Paul . Stregevsky
- Re: suggested student cameras? Paul . Stregevsky
- re: suggested student cameras? Rory Flynn
- Re: suggested student cameras? martin tammer
- Re: suggested student cameras? James Adams
- RE: suggested student cameras? Bucky
- Re: suggested student cameras? petit miam
- Re: suggested student cameras? jlmowery
- Re: suggested student cameras? Frank Theriault
- Re: suggested student cameras? Aaron Reynolds
- Re: suggested student cameras? Frank Theriault
- Re: Praktica LTL, was: suggested studen... Aaron Reynolds
- Re: Praktica LTL, was: suggested s... William Robb
- Re: Praktica LTL, was: suggest... Aaron Reynolds
- Loading the Majic Noodles William Robb
- Re: Loading the Majic Noodles Steve Larson
- Re: Loading the Majic Noodles petit miam
- Re: Praktica LTL, was: suggest... Jeff Tokayer
- Re: Praktica LTL, was: suggest... petit miam