Not so. Those consumers who used to bring film in for processing are now bringing in memory cards for us to print, and those prints are basically the same cost as film prints and are on the same paper.
Bill ----- Original Message ----- From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2004 1:32 PM Subject: Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? > Bill, we understand your worry. Your job is on the line. I would suggest your > local government agency that retrains folks for new jobs, except that from my > experience they will only retrain you for another obsolete about to go down the > drain of progress job. > > Something to think about though, there are still blacksmiths out there, still > making a living. > > -- > > William Robb wrote: > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: Vic > > Subject: Re: Film vs Digita, was: lRe: Pentax is Dying? > > > > > > > >>I know what you are saying but I think everyone here is > > > > overreacting. Calm > > > >>down, there are too many cameras out there that shoot film for film > > > > to go away > > > >>any time soon... > > > > > > I assure you, I am quite calm, and only somewhat enebriated. > > What part of "processing is down 50% over last year" dis you miss? > > A year ago I was processing upwards of 700 rolls per day on a normal > > day. > > This year, a busy day is 400 rolls, average is closer to 300. > > Every one I talk to is in the same boat. > > Where I live, another small player that wasn't able to adapt to > > digital processing went tits up just a few weeks ago. > > > > Define "soon" > > > > William Robb > > > > > > > > -- > graywolf > http://graywolfphoto.com/graywolf.html > >
