But since so many seem to, I've changed my question to, "For Pete's sake, why does it matter?"
Might as well argue the mechanical differences between traditional flat vs. round toothpicks.
keith whaley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
ernreed said:
We've established many times, including quite recently, that we cannot reach a consensus on what makes a "pro" camera.
Thats cause the camera isn't all there is to whether it is pro or not.
The company has to offer stellar support service as well.
Pentax is a bit spotty in this regard.
....
Meaning then that according to your standards, the LX isn't a "pro" camera either?
I mean, just to be clear, this got underway because of the claim that the LX was the last 35mm pro camera Pentax made, and my opinion that the PZ-1 and PZ-
1p also qualify.
If it's your opinion that the company has to stand behind it and therefore there's no such thing as a Pentax 35mm pro camera, okay, I understand your reasoning.
ERN
