I've found the autofocus performance of the DA 50-200 to be quite good, even in continuous mode. I shot a bunch of pics of my granddaughter running around the yard with this combo last week. As a bit of a test I also shot a car driving down the street and a bicyclist approaching. The camera was able to focus in all these instances. However, I would add that while this would probably be a good lens for soccer (if you're standing on the sidelines), it's too short for shooting birds in flight. Paul -------------- Original message ---------------------- From: Tim Øsleby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm debating with myself. > I have an urge for the K10 (who doesn't?). I've also got a need for an AF > tele zoom for soccer, birds in flight and general use. > > The obvious solutions for those two needs is a combo of K10 and DA* 60-250. > In a long perspective it is very likely I'll go for this combo, but I can't > afford both at the same time. > > I'm thinking six-seven months ahead. Then I'll be going to a soccer > tournament. Last year I tried shooting with MF. The keepers rate was low, to > low for my needs. So what do I do? By the zoom of my dreams, the DA* and use > it on my DS. Or do I by a K10 and DA 50-200 combo, and the DA* later? > > The soccer tournament is for kids. So the game is pretty hard to predict. In > other words, I will need speedy AF performance. So one of the things I'm > wondering about is the AF performance of K10/50-200. Anybody got some > insights on this? > > > Tim > Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian) > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
-- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
