Of course the question comes to mind, if a digital file has an almost
infinate data life, what difference does digital print life make?

--graywolf
-------------------------------------------------
The optimist's cup is half full,
The pessimist's is half empty,
The wise man enjoys his drink.


----- Original Message -----
From: Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 8:39 PM
Subject: Re: Points of Order


> >> I know about Wilhelm, and it's the marketing people who are
> > hyping print
> >> longevity.  When I see a 50+ year old ink jet print that
> > hasn't faded,
> >> I'll believe that they have reasonable longevity.  Over the
> > years many
> >> scientists, engineers, designers, and manufacturers have made
> >> innumerable claims, all based on then current knowledge and
> > information,
> >> and many of those claims have been proven wrong.
> >
> > And I still have properly stored colour prints that have faded
> > in less than 10 years. The marketing people are hyping print
> > longevity because of Wilhelm, not in spite of him.
> > William Robb
>
>
>
> Yes, I'm afraid Shel and I disagree on this point rather strongly. I've
> followed Henry Wilhelm's work for years (although I don't know him
> personally), have read most of his book, and know a colleague of his quite
> well. Wilhelm has at times been an almost lone voice agitating for print
> longevity, fighting mendacity and resistance among the manufacturers and
> apathy on the part of the public. In the early days of digital, Wilhelm
was
> a voiciferous and outspoken critic of the poor longevity of digital
prints,
> and a great and important advocate of better LE as an important property
of
> imaging systems. It isn't far from the truth to say that he singlehandedly
> brought print longevity to the forefront as an issue in digital imaging,
and
> he has certainly improved the situation dramatically for the benefit of
all
> of us--and of posterity.
>
> IMHO the entire photographic community owes a considerable debt of
gratitude
> to this man. He is one of only small band of photo-technical people
working
> today who will deserve a place in the history of the medium.
>
> --Mike
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to