John S.,
Seems to me we are in violent agreement with each other. :-)
best,
Jostein
2008/10/19 John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> From: AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> 2008/10/18 John Sessoms <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>>> So what is the basis for claiming the government "sanitized" history? And
>>> > who is being revisionist?
>>
>> That's the second time you ask who's revisionist. What are you
>> actually trying to imply by that?
>>
>> The government is not the only bad guy in town, either.
>>
>
> Indeed.
>
> The SUBJECT is "Govt Agency doctors photograph to sanitize history"
>
> It's established to my satisfaction that the photograph was NOT "doctored"
> BY A GOVT AGENCY. It appears to me the PHOTO was not "doctored" at all.
>
> *Did the government revise ("sanitize") history?
>
> No, I would say they did not ... or at least, no one has shown that they did
> so in this instance.
>
> *Might they have done so at other times?
>
> Arguably, and where they have, I do not support that action. But that's not
> what we have here.
>
> *Is someone else "revising" history if they make a false accusation of
> government duplicity?
>
> Yes, I would say someone making such a false accusation is as much guilty of
> revising history as they claim the government to be.
>
> That's all I'm saying.
>
> Somebody got all bent out of shape over something that didn't happen. Better
> to save your indignation for things that DO happen.
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
> follow the directions.
>
--
http://www.alunfoto.no/galleri/
http://alunfoto.blogspot.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
