On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:15 PM, Graydon <o...@uniserve.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:12:02PM -0400, Adam Maas scripsit:
>> On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 12:05 PM, Graydon <o...@uniserve.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Apr 12, 2009 at 07:14:34AM -0600, William Robb scripsit:
> [snip]
>> >> I hate to say it, but the big boys in the sandbox seem to be able to get
>> >> fast and accurate out of their AF systems.
>> >
>> > Generally at the cost of the manual focus, though, and so far as I can
>> > tell (never having had my hands on one), the 55/1.4 is effectively a
>> > manual focus lens with a very long focus throw that happens to have had
>> > an SDM auto-focus motor included.
>> >
>> > Which is one of those design decisions you could certainly wish they
>> > publicized more.
>> >
>> > -- Graydon (or it's just the SDM motor is one size too small...)
>>
>> If that's the case, bravo for Pentax in doing this with a lens that
>> will get a lot of MF use. One of the biggest problems with using AF
>> lenses in manual is the short focus throws. That's one major reason
>> why I'm slowly replacing my last few AF Nikkors with MF equivalents.
>
> I don't think it's a *BAD* design decision; it's got obvious benefits
> for the intended uses of the lens.
>
> It does strike me as the sort of thing an able marketing department
> would announce vigorously as a feature, rather than having people
> discover it -- expecting something else -- and regard it as a bug.
>
> -- Graydon

Pentax doesn't have a marketing division. They've got 1 guy who
apparently buys billboards all over Toronto and thinks that suffices
for a global marketing campaign.



-- 
M. Adam Maas
http://www.mawz.ca
Explorations of the City Around Us.

--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to