The 645 dependency, being unique in the DSLR group, would to a great extent satisfy, or would at least take off the edge, of the limited FF craving.
Jack --- On Wed, 4/28/10, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: K-7 replacement? > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" <pdml@pdml.net> > Date: Wednesday, April 28, 2010, 10:22 AM > Largely because it *should* lead to > lower overall noise levels and I > can then use all my legacy lenses at the focal lengths for > which I > purchased them. > > Aside from that, I believe Pentax should be competing in > the 36x24 mm > format market, as Nikon, Canon, and Sony all do. Their > flagship DSLR's > are all in that format. So Pentax *may*, *might*, *probably > does* > appear to be the slouch of the 4 mfrs. (which of course we > know is > true in numerous ways). Plus it would provide an upgrade > path that was > not 645 dependent. > > Tom C. > > On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 1:09 PM, Miserere <miser...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > On 28 April 2010 13:03, Tom C <caka...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> FF would be nice... :-) > > > > Why do you want full-frame, Tom? > > > > > > --M. > > > > > > -- > > > > \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com > > > > http://EnticingTheLight.com > > A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment > > > > -- > > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > > PDML@pdml.net > > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link > directly above and follow the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
